Wednesday, September 8, 2010

point : theories

I have been having a hard time catching up with this lecture, so through studying and researching it helped me understainding better. We had learnt, basic elements of design but its factors go more in depth. These elements were covered in a broad field of history and theory that were confusng at first. I could imagine the big picture but i had missed the small details that were covered.

These elements that were mention were the well -being hath conditions of commodity, firmness and delight. It hit my head. Many designers forgot these elements and design what they want. "Understanding Architecture" states "Architecture is a nonverbal form of communication, a mute record of the culture that produced it." Yes, we are dealing with an essential problem. While studying this field of architecture in the U.S and Korea, I noticed it is a universal problem we all face and this chapter helps explain why the problem exist. We need to design with these basic elements to have a product function.



Also, I really enjoyed to researching the four structures and symbolizig them. It was a great opportunity to study these buildings closely.
Monticello was the first structure i enjoyed. I realized many factors through studying it that i would not of before. For instance, i could understand why Monticello was important to American architectural history. Before reading these articles i did not know who Thomas Jefferson was and his accomplishment during his life. His design for Monticello combined neoclassical principles
that were not only beautiful but entranced American historythat created a new style called Jefferson Architecture. This style then formed an unique culture for American structures.

Before studying this, i thought all Western Architecture was the same but now I can see the difference and historyof American architecture alone. Thomas Jefferson design has lasted over forty years because it combined classical elements with the surrounding context that unified the design. It is very hard to be remembered in histor and leave behind remarkable achievement. That is what i want to do and i want to be like him!




I have noticed that every building or structure reflects the people's way of life, ideologies, subcultures and histories. I did not understand before. Missing that part makes my work not satisfying. I felt wanting to add something on my projects that did not have meaning but i did not know why. Now, I know what I have been missing before. When i design, i need to understand the social concerns and needs of a particular worldview, or culture. Design needs to fit context of its entire surrounding to function. With this in mind i will step forward into becoming a good designer

6 comments:

  1. It's great you learned something from the unit, specifically that aspects of culture are intimately tied in respect to their products of architecture. Although there were grammatical errors found throughout the paper, it did not detract from your overall message and point of illustration. Apparently, missing some of the lectures did not harm your understanding of the unit. Also, the image you chose to provide helps reinforce the idea of change- that style avoids stagnation, always evolving with the times. My main point of contention, however, concerns your slightly limited word count. Although it didn't satisfy the 500 word count required, you provided enough material to get your point across. Ah, and your paper would be more awesome if there was some more time spent on editing. Having someone read over your material ahead of time does wonders to the quality of the final product.

    ReplyDelete
  2. With the exception of a few translation and grammatical errors, you did a great job sticking to your point of finding new ways of design. “life, ideologies, subcultures and histories…” While your images displayed the change and new design you were writing about, I would like to have seen some written examples of “change.” (i.e….. the acorns used in the moldings, symmetry of the structure, and technological advances in the space that pertain to the culture and area in which the structure was built.) Also, be aware of the required word count.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Good job for taking the time to study and research in order to better understand the course material.
    I can tell by reading your post that you really care about your development as a designer. You express some great ideas that we all need to think about more often.
    I like how you talked about the map project and what you learned from it. The pictures you included do a good job of backing up what you wrote.
    I won't comment on the word count since it was already mentioned twice. :)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Aside from the grammatical errors and word count, I would suggest you try to tie what you've learned to specific examples that will back up your points. Related it to the readings and certain spaces would make this easier. I agree with the earlier comment that your passion to develop as a design does shine through in your post.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I believe that you could have had more to say about the overall lecture theories unit. I know that you missed some classes but a lot more information was located in the readings as a whole. I really like how you were able to see that there are variations in western architecture. The word count and minor errors were already touched on so i won’t add on. Your images relate well to your essay.

    ReplyDelete
  6. (Faith Ramsey) I agree we do have a problem with design her in America. Not bashing it, but if we would follow the basic principles of design, and also the theory that Vitruvious purposed, Architecture would be taken to a completely different level. I do think you could have addressed more points in this unit, far as to the appeals of design, form and others, overall I think you have done well.

    ReplyDelete